Sora clips are among the more identifiable generated videos, at least at first: OpenAI signs them with Content Credentials, and public exports carry a moving watermark. Both disappear the moment someone crops and re-encodes — which is exactly when frame analysis matters.
Three layers, in descending order of convenience — and only the last one survives a determined re-upload.
OpenAI embeds signed C2PA manifests in Sora output, marking it as AI-generated. Definitive while intact.
Public Sora exports have carried a visible animated watermark. Croppable, and routinely cropped.
Download, crop, re-upload to a platform — manifest gone, watermark cut. Nothing above helps at that point.
Across a longer shot, object detail and proportions subtly reconstruct themselves frame to frame. Real footage does not do this.
Contact between objects, cloth, liquids and crowds hold up briefly, then stop obeying consistent rules.
Every extracted frame still carries the statistical fingerprints of generation — frequency profile, absent sensor noise, flat texture coherence.
Full resolution, straight from the source. Screenshots and re-saved copies destroy most of the evidence we measure.
Three neural networks look at the image as a whole. Nine forensic methods examine it as a signal: frequency (FFT) analysis, noise pattern, pixel-level statistics, EXIF metadata, Error Level Analysis, texture coherence, colour distribution, Benford's Law and edge detection.
Every method reports separately, so you can tell whether the verdict rests on one weak signal or on nine that agree.
For still images rather than video, Start with our AI image detector — it covers any image type and runs the same twelve methods.
Most detectors give you one number from one model. We run twelve independent analyzers and weight them — three neural networks carry the majority, but nine forensic methods examine the file as a signal and can overrule them. Here is the exact weighting we use in production:
| Method | Weight in final score |
|---|---|
| Neural network #2 | 25% |
| Neural network #1 | 15% |
| Neural network #3 | 15% |
| EXIF metadata | 10% |
| Frequency (FFT) | 6% |
| Benford's Law | 6% |
| Noise pattern | 5% |
| Error Level Analysis | 4% |
| Texture coherence | 4% |
| Edge detection | 4% |
| Pixel statistics | 3% |
| Colour distribution | 3% |
These are our own numbers, not an industry estimate — every check run through FakeSec since launch. The split is closer than most people expect: roughly four in ten uploads really do turn out to be generated.
On our internal benchmark of 240,000 images (120,000 AI-generated, 120,000 real) the combined score reaches up to 98% on unedited, full-resolution files. That number drops, sometimes sharply, in four situations — and you should know them before trusting any result:
No detector on the market is 100% accurate — ours included. Treat a high score as strong evidence, not as proof. When a decision matters, look at which of the 12 methods agreed.
Video is the hardest case in this whole category. Platform re-encoding destroys much of the forensic signal, so a clip pulled from social media gives a weaker answer than the original file. Upload the best-quality version you can obtain.
Create a free account and get 3 checks. Full breakdown across all 12 methods, no card required.