Home Gemini Image Detector

Gemini Image Detector

Google's approach is different from everyone else's. Instead of relying on metadata that vanishes the moment a file is re-saved, Imagen and Gemini embed SynthID — a watermark hidden in the pixels themselves, designed to survive cropping, resizing and compression.

Pixel-level forensics
Metadata & C2PA check
12 independent methods
Free to start
Check an image free Try in Telegram
Free account includes 3 checks — no card required.

SynthID, and why it changes the problem

Every other marking scheme lives in metadata and dies with the first screenshot. Google put theirs in the pixels, which is a genuinely stronger idea — with one practical catch.

An invisible pixel watermark

SynthID is embedded in the image data itself and is designed to survive cropping, resizing, compression and filters — the exact operations that destroy ordinary metadata.

The catch: it is Google's to read

Verification runs through Google's own tooling. Third-party detectors, ours included, cannot read SynthID directly — which is why we analyse the pixel statistics instead of chasing a watermark we have no key for.

C2PA on newer models

Since the Gemini 3 Pro image models, Google output also carries Content Credentials alongside SynthID — readable in our free EXIF viewer while intact.

Its own rendering signature

Google models produce characteristic lighting and colour handling that our colour distribution and frequency analyzers pick up independently of any watermark.

Editing-model output

Gemini's image editing changes only part of a photo, leaving a region whose noise and compression history differ from the rest — our manipulation methods target exactly that.

No capture metadata

As with every generator: no camera, no lens, no exposure block.

How the analysis works

1

Upload the original file

Full resolution, straight from the source. Screenshots and re-saved copies destroy most of the evidence we measure.

2

12 independent methods run in parallel

Three neural networks look at the image as a whole. Nine forensic methods examine it as a signal: frequency (FFT) analysis, noise pattern, pixel-level statistics, EXIF metadata, Error Level Analysis, texture coherence, colour distribution, Benford's Law and edge detection.

3

You see the breakdown, not just a number

Every method reports separately, so you can tell whether the verdict rests on one weak signal or on nine that agree.

How much each method counts

Most detectors give you one number from one model. We run twelve independent analyzers and weight them — three neural networks carry the majority, but nine forensic methods examine the file as a signal and can overrule them. Here is the exact weighting we use in production:

Neural network #2
25%
Neural network #1
15%
Neural network #3
15%
EXIF metadata
10%
Frequency (FFT)
6%
Benford's Law
6%
Noise pattern
5%
Error Level Analysis
4%
Texture coherence
4%
Edge detection
4%
Pixel statistics
3%
Colour distribution
3%
Weights are read straight from our scoring engine, so this chart is always current.
MethodWeight in final score
Neural network #225%
Neural network #115%
Neural network #315%
EXIF metadata10%
Frequency (FFT)6%
Benford's Law6%
Noise pattern5%
Error Level Analysis4%
Texture coherence4%
Edge detection4%
Pixel statistics3%
Colour distribution3%

What people actually upload

These are our own numbers, not an industry estimate — every check run through FakeSec since launch. The split is closer than most people expect: roughly four in ten uploads really do turn out to be generated.

366
images analysed
40.7%
flagged AI-generated
50.3%
confirmed authentic
9.0%
inconclusive
Authentic — 184 AI-generated — 149 Inconclusive — 33
50.3%
40.7%
Live figure, updated hourly from our own database. "Inconclusive" means the 12 methods disagreed enough that we would rather say so than guess.

Who needs this

  • Journalists — Images circulating from Google's consumer tools.
  • Educators — Submitted work claimed as original.
  • Platforms — Disclosure and labelling policies.
  • Buyers — Product and listing photography.

Accuracy — and where it breaks down

On our internal benchmark of 240,000 images (120,000 AI-generated, 120,000 real) the combined score reaches up to 98% on unedited, full-resolution files. That number drops, sometimes sharply, in four situations — and you should know them before trusting any result:

  • Heavy compression. Social platforms re-encode everything. A photo pulled from Instagram has already lost much of its noise signature.
  • Screenshots. A screenshot is a new image of an image. Original metadata and compression history are gone.
  • Stylised content. Flat colour and clean lines remove the texture and noise evidence forensic methods depend on.
  • Post-processing. Added grain, filters, upscaling and manual retouching all mask generation traces.

No detector on the market is 100% accurate — ours included. Treat a high score as strong evidence, not as proof. When a decision matters, look at which of the 12 methods agreed.

Honest limitation: we cannot verify SynthID — that requires Google's own tooling, and no third party can do it. What we do is independent forensic analysis of the pixels. If you specifically need a SynthID verdict, use Google's verification tool; for everything else, the twelve methods work regardless of origin.

Frequently asked questions

Can you detect SynthID?
No, and nobody outside Google can — verification requires their tooling. We would rather state that plainly than imply a capability we do not have. Our analysis is independent: pixel statistics, noise, frequency and metadata.
Does SynthID really survive screenshots?
It is designed to survive cropping, resizing, compression and filters, which is a meaningfully stronger design than metadata-based marking. Heavy re-processing can still degrade it.
What about 'nano banana' images?
Google's newer image models fall under the same umbrella: SynthID in the pixels and, on recent versions, C2PA Content Credentials in the file.
Should I check the metadata first?
Yes — it is free and instant. Recent Gemini output may still carry Content Credentials naming the model. If they are gone, run the full analysis.
Can Google images be detected without SynthID?
That is exactly what we do. Generated images share statistical properties regardless of which company made them — that is what the neural models and nine forensic methods are measuring.
Is it free?
Metadata reading is free without an account. Full analysis: 3 free checks on signup.

Related tools

Check your first image now

Create a free account and get 3 checks. Full breakdown across all 12 methods, no card required.